SFUSD

Press Release: Letter to SFUSD from Alumni Associations Against Schools’ Name Changes

October 8, 2020

San Francisco Board of Education

555 Franklin Street

San Francisco, CA 94102

Dear President Sanchez, Commissioners, Superintendent Matthews,

We represent thousands of graduates from San Francisco’s public schools. Over the decades, we’ve given back by mentoring students, volunteering in school cleanups, and donating hundreds of thousands of dollars annually for scholarships and programs not funded by tax dollars. Our foremost objective has always been to help educate the next generation.

But we are concerned the district is undertaking a misguided and costly distraction by proposing to rename at least 45 elementary, middle and high schools.  Yes, school names should reflect the community’s values, but the activities of your School Names Advisory Committee (committee) undermine the opportunity for a legitimate conversation about the appropriateness of the schools’ current names and, most critically, raises questions about how you are managing students’ educational needs.

School names have been changed in the past. But this committee is upending tradition and is employing an anti-historical bias.  Its members have not consulted professional historians, representatives of the City’s richly diverse ethnic communities, or neighbors living and working adjacent to these schools.

This committee’s one-sided, embarrassing misreading of historical facts does not promote education or shared values.  We need an inclusive process that will allow all communities to be heard, use professional historians applying verifiable data, issue a written report why a school name might be changed so the community can make a considered decision, and suspend the current process until everyone can safely return to school sites for the robust and thoughtful conversations you directed in the original Board resolution.  Finally, in the midst of the District’s financial difficulties, we wonder where will the District find the estimated $9 million ($150-200,000 per school) needed to make these proposed name changes.

This November, citizens are voting for the school board. You are also asking San Francisco’s voters and the community at large to ratify your financial stewardship. It does not appear you are acting wisely with your foray into name changing and misapplying the public’s money.

COVID-19 has made education more difficult. It also has made it more challenging to have important and long overdue discussions about race and justice. What goes on inside the classroom has a greater impact on education than the name on the outside of a school building. Let’s focus on that and continue to work together to support our children’s education.  We think these conversations need to happen and would like to meet with you.

Bill Mustanich, President, Abraham Lincoln High School Alumni Association

John Trasvina, President, Lowell High School Alumni Association

John Rothman, President, George Washington High School Alumni Association

Emily Sanchez Powell, President Emerita, Balboa High School Alumni Association

Charlene Mori, President, Galileo High School Alumni Association

5 replies »

  1. As a former student of George Washington High school, I am appalled at even a suggestion of changing its’ name. The reason that you are making this change is based upon our judgements of a persons life over 3 centuries ago. Granted the customs of the time required people in servitude to work the plantations and would have not been tolerated over 150 years ago. The United states has always been a country with its’ economy heavily based upon agriculture. Today migrant workers have been elevated to the task that the slaves of the past have had to undertake. Are we in the future going to look back upon the work these individuals are undertaking and make judgements on those that employ them ? Are their actions that criminal of a nature to justify the changes that we will see in the future ? There is also more for a student to learn than by altering history and tarnishing his name, by explaining the courses of time and tolerance.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Rather than a concern over the quality of the education, the Board focuses its time and resources on name changes and covering murals.

    With priorities such as these, the District should eliminate the School Board and redirect those funds to teaching our students reading, writing and arithmetic.

    Like

  3. The committee didn’t do any in depth research in choosing 45+ schools to rename and watching the archived meetings it is clear they relied on one person who made assumptions and was often wrong. They didn’t even ask the district for a list of names of the schools, Roosevelt is an example of the flawed process, it was cringe worthy to watch the committee members wonder which Roosevelt when that should be basic knowledge before the process even began, as an aside, it was named after Theodore. Some names should be changed but this committee is not reflecting a democratic process and trying to rush this through so they don’t hear from people who disagree with them.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s