letter to the editor

Letter to the Editor: We Need a Big Plan to Address Poverty, Homelessness


The full page “Advertising Feature” in the July 12, Sunday Chronicle, Chan/Zuckerberg Initiative – Housing Affordability is a Regional Issue and it Requires a Regional Cross-Sector Response, has high-sounding language, but lacks specifics on how to effect real change. To quote, “The goal is not only to create more economic mobility opportunities for people but also to attack the crisis at its roots by disrupting the cycles of poverty and homelessness.” 
A big plan like that needs more than a Regional Cross-Sector Response.”  A plan to disrupt the “cycles of poverty and homelessness” needs big ideas and big money, like Congresswoman Barbara Lee’s plan to cut as much as $350 billion from Pentagon spending.  As Ms. Lee says, “It’s time to cut weapons of war and prioritize the well-being of our troops, anti-poverty programs, public health initiatives, and diplomacy.” Ms. Chan and Mr. Zuckerberg, would you be willing to publicly support this plan? I think Barbara Lee knows what she’s talking about.

Would you advocate for increasing the top marginal tax rate for the very wealthy? When Ronald Reagan took office, the top tax rate was 70%; today it’s 37%. We could really use that money to raise teachers’ salaries and to provide clean, safe, well-equipped classrooms for all children so they can actually have “more economic mobility opportunities.” California has the nation’s highest rate of poverty at 20.6% according to the U.S. Census Bureau.  We need billions to fix the decades of neglect that created this inequality. A recent report in the SF Chronicle has the headline, “Income gap highest in more than 50 years.” Are you willing to address the income gap? That would go a long way way towards ending homelessness.

You talk the talk, will you walk the walk?

David Romano

3 replies »

  1. Housing affordability affects everyone, and though the big decisions may be made at the federal and state level, we all feel the impact. Thanks, David Romano, for your letter. It’s important to shine a light on the inequities in the country in order to better understand how we can deal with them.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Because of tents and the skyrocketing poverty rate growing as it is, why aren’t Katrina Type homes being considered for these unfortunate people? For nothing else but the tent living life style, that the State and private taxpayers are now paying for, why not allocate monies toward these very small homes (one bedrooms) being taken into consideration?
    For every dollar the city of SF or residents spend for this, we should have all these newer high tech Billion dollar companies put in 75% of the cost considering they are mostly directly responsible for the homeless and the poverty. Actual contributions and future locations to be determined.
    ITS THE RIGHT THING TO DO, because the way I see it, any money currently or previously put out for the needs of the these residents have been turned out to be a massive failure.
    With Covid-19 out of control, this would help with the Stay at home orders and all the safety issues, such as people needing to quarantine. It can stop the definitely slow the spread. FACT.
    This would not be an inexpensive endeavor but money allocated the correct way without the waste we see so often in SF and with staying on target with the project, it could immensely turn this beautiful historic City around. IMHO. Please consider!
    M DiMambro


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s